Insured and ReadyCover you understand before you need it

Home & Contents

Approved Contractors And The Guarantee Behind A Repair

Insurers prefer their own repair networks because it gives them price control and a workmanship guarantee, and choosing your own builder changes who stands behind the work.

A brick building facade with two distinct doorways and metal fencing, featuring mailboxes and urban elements.
Photograph by William Larsen via Pexels
General information. This is journalism, not personalised financial advice. Figures, rates and rules change and vary by country — check current terms before acting. How we work.

After a household loss the insurer usually offers its own contractor rather than a cash payment. The offer carries a guarantee, and declining it moves that responsibility.

Why the network exists

Insurers contract with repair firms at agreed rates and volumes. A guaranteed pipeline of work buys pricing well below what an individual householder would be quoted.

Network use also standardises the process. Scoping, materials and reinstatement standards are agreed in advance, which shortens claims and reduces disputes about scope.

The saving is real enough that many insurers price the policy assuming network repair, and offer a cash alternative at a lower figure.

What the workmanship guarantee actually covers

Network repairs typically carry a guarantee on workmanship for a stated period, backed by the insurer rather than only by the contractor. If the repair fails, the insurer returns.

That is a meaningful difference from a builder's own warranty, which depends on the firm still trading. Contractor insolvency is a common reason a private guarantee evaporates.

The guarantee covers the quality of the work done, not the underlying cause. A repaired leak that recurs from a different pipe is a new claim.

Using your own contractor

Most policies permit it, usually subject to the insurer approving the estimate. The settlement is then based on what the work should reasonably cost, not necessarily on the quote submitted.

Once that route is taken, the householder contracts directly with the builder and holds the relationship if anything goes wrong. The insurer's guarantee does not attach.

Where a household has strong reasons for a particular firm, such as heritage work or matching earlier alterations, that trade-off can be worth making deliberately.

Scope disagreements are the usual friction

The contractor's scope is agreed with the insurer, which means it covers damage caused by the insured event and nothing else. Pre-existing defects fall outside it.

Householders often expect a fuller restoration than the scope provides, particularly where a repaired area sits alongside older finishes. Matching and betterment questions arise here.

Raising these at the scoping stage is far more effective than after works have begun, because the scope is what the contractor is paid to deliver.

Where the policy decides

Some wordings reserve the right to insist on network repair, while others give the policyholder a free choice with a cash settlement calculated differently.

Whether a cash alternative is offered at full scope value or at the insurer's discounted network cost is stated in the wording and materially changes the sum.

Repair network arrangements, guarantee periods and cash settlement bases vary by insurer and jurisdiction and change between policy versions. The wording in force governs the option available.

Questions readers ask

Does the wind speed have to be recorded at my house?

No, and it rarely is. Insurers use the nearest available station, which is why local variation is a reasonable point to raise.

Are fences ever covered for storm?

Sometimes, on wider policies or as an add-on, but the standard position across many markets is that storm damage to fences is excluded.

Home & Contentsstormweatherclaimshome
Colette Fenn
Contributing writer, Insured and Ready

Colette covers home and contents insurance and has read more policy wordings than anyone should.

Also by Colette Fenn