Insured and ReadyCover you understand before you need it

Home & Contents

Ordinance Or Law Coverage Pays For The Code Upgrade

A homeowners policy pays to restore what was there, while building codes may require something better, and the gap between the two is a separate coverage.

A brick building facade with two distinct doorways and metal fencing, featuring mailboxes and urban elements.
Photograph by William Larsen via Pexels
General information. This is journalism, not personalised financial advice. Figures, rates and rules change and vary by country — check current terms before acting. How we work.

A property policy promises to restore what was lost. Building codes may require the replacement to be built to a newer standard, and the extra cost of meeting that standard is not automatically covered.

Indemnity and code requirements point in different directions

Indemnity restores the pre-loss condition. A forty-year-old house is rebuilt as a forty-year-old house, priced accordingly.

Codes move forward. Wiring standards, insulation requirements, roof attachment and elevation rules all tighten over time, and a permit is issued against today's code.

The rebuild therefore costs more than the thing that was lost, and standard policy language often excludes that increase because it is not part of restoring what existed.

The coverage has three distinct parts

  • The value of the undamaged portion that a code official orders demolished.
  • The cost of that demolition and of removing the debris created by it.
  • The increased cost of rebuilding the whole structure to current code.

These are separate elements, and a policy can include one without the others or cap each differently.

The third is usually the largest and the one most often limited to a percentage of the dwelling limit.

Partial losses trigger it more often than total losses

Many jurisdictions apply a threshold: once damage exceeds a defined share of the structure's value, the entire building must be brought to current code rather than patched.

A moderate fire can therefore cross the line and convert a repair into a full code-compliant rebuild.

Older homes sit closest to that edge, because more of the structure predates current requirements.

Nonconforming use is the harder problem

A house built legally may no longer conform to current zoning on setbacks, height or lot coverage, and is permitted to remain as a legal nonconforming use.

That status can be lost when the structure is substantially destroyed, meaning the replacement must comply with rules the original never had to.

Coverage for that consequence is limited, and in some situations the constraint is legal rather than financial.

Where the limits and rules are set

Ordinance or law coverage is normally an endorsement with a stated limit, expressed as a percentage of the dwelling coverage and shown on the declarations page.

Building codes are adopted locally, and coastal and seismic regions revise them more frequently, so the exposure varies enormously by address.

A local building department can explain the applicable code thresholds and a licensed agent can explain the endorsement. Requirements vary by state and change over time.

Questions readers ask

Does the wind speed have to be recorded at my house?

No, and it rarely is. Insurers use the nearest available station, which is why local variation is a reasonable point to raise.

Are fences ever covered for storm?

Sometimes, on wider policies or as an add-on, but the standard position across many markets is that storm damage to fences is excluded.

Home & Contentsstormweatherclaimshome
Colette Fenn
Contributing writer, Insured and Ready

Colette covers home and contents insurance and has read more policy wordings than anyone should.

Also by Colette Fenn